VISHNU KARUA @ TAMBA @ VISHNU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6299/2026 · 2026-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19557 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19557 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20162] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6299 of 2026
------ Vishnu Karua @ Tamba @ Vishnu, aged about 25 years, son of late Kathra Karua, resident of Gosai Mohalla, Pathak Bari, P.O. & P.S. Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
Mr. Mayank Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-08-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tata Nagar Rail P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 115 (2), 118 (1), 126 (2), 109, 352, 351 (2), 304 (2), 62 and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant for the purpose of committing robbery. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.4923 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner
during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Chakradharpur, Camp Court at Tatanagar, Jamshedpur in connection with Tata Nagar Rail P.S. Case No.01 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-08.07.2026-Animesh/