APHC010155052018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 381/2018 Between: 1. ADAPA USHA RANI, W/O RAMA GUNTUR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 2. ADAPA RAMA GUNTUR,, S/O VENKATESARLU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 3. KANDA MOHAN AMARNATH,, S/O VENKATESWARLII, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF GANESWARA RAO STREET, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SUNKARA SAMBRAJYAM, W/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. 2. SUNKARA PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF D.NO.27-7-20, 4TH LINE, KANNAVARI THOTA, GUNTUR. 3. MAREDDY RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O SEETHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O 2/11, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. 4. MAREDDY RAMESH REDDY, S/O SEETHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 2/11, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. 5. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, PATTABHIPURAM BRANCH, PATTABHIPURAM MAIN ROAD, GUNTUR. 6. AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, NATRAJ COMPLEX, KALESWARA ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): May be pleased to set-aside the judgment and decree dated 6.10.2017 passed in O.S.No. 290 of 2010 by the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone delay of 10 days in filing the first appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspend the judgement and decree dated.06/10/2017 passed in O.S.no.290/2010 by the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the first Appeal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order passed in IA.No.2 of 2018 in AS.No.381 of 2018 dated 10-09-2018 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to advance Petitioner appeal suit in AS No. 381/2018 to the nearest date for final hearing otherwise we will not able to see the results of my case and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to advance appeal suit in A.S.No. 381/2018 to the nearest date for final hearing as the petitioner already filed paper booklets, and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PONNAM RAVINDRA BABU 2. T V JAGGI REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 381/2018 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 09.09.2024, 30.09.2024, 18.02.2025, 01.04.2025, 16.04.2025, 07.07.2025, 29.07.2025 & 03.09.2025 the following orders were passed: “09.09.2024: At the request made on behalf of the learned senior counsel Mr.V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, appearing for the appellant, list on 17.09.2024. 30.09.2024: No representation on behalf of the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is ready to argue the matter. List the appeal on 23.10.2024. 18.02.2025 At request made on behalf of Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the appellants, list the matter on 11.03.2025. No representation on behalf of the respondents. 01.04.2025 A request has been made on behalf of appellant/s side for adjournment. Post after two weeks. Learned counsel for the respondent/s expressed some urgency. 16.04.2025 Request has been made on behalf of the appellants‟ counsel in A.S.No.381 of 2018 for adjournment. 2. No representation for the respondents. 3. List after three weeks. 07.07.2025 The docket order shows that on previous dates, continuously, the appeal was adjourned on the request made by the appellants‟ counsel. On one such date, learned counsel for the respondents‟ expressed urgency in the matter, though on few dates, he was also absent. 2. Today also, request for adjournment on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants has been made, which is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Finally, list on 21.07.2025. 4. No further adjournment shall be requested. 29.07.2025 Request has been made by the respondents‟ counsel, for adjournment. 2. The matters are adjourned. 03.09.2025 Request has been made on behalf of the appellants‟ counsel in A.S.No.381 of 2018, for adjournment on the ground that he is abroad. 2. Post the matters after three (03) weeks.” 2. The above orders show that the matter was adjourned at request made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants in most of the dates. 3. Today there is no representation for the appellants. 4. Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 is present. 5. The matter pertains to the year 2018. 5. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for „want of prosecution‟. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 09.02.2026 AG 162 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 381/2018 Dated: 09.02.2026 AG