Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19545 (CHH)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER v. SOMESH PATHAK

WA/410/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21560-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 410 of 2026 1 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat , Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Somesh Pathak S/o Shri Om Prakash Pathak Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Government Higher Secondary School, Mohgaon, Block Pandariya, District-Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner - Cum - Directorate Of Panchayat , Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, Kabirdham , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., 5 - Block Education Officer Pandariya, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Praveen Das, Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.05.11 12:11:13 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 08/05/2026 1. Heard Ms. Deepali Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Praveen Das, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondents and Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1. 2. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner against the order dated 16.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 940 of 2020 (Somesh Pathak vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others) whereby, the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein and set aside the order dated 26.12.2019. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant says that she wishes to file review petition before the learned Single Judge. 4. Accordingly, the present writ appeal is dismissed with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- SD Sd S Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok