[2026:JHHC:20200] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6316 of 2026 ------ Deepak Kumar Tiwary @ Deepak Kumar Tiwari, aged about 20 years, Son of Dilip Tiwari, resident of Village Lurunga, P.O. & P.S. Barkagaon, Dist.- Hazaribag. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 125(a), 125(b), 281, 324(4), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the unlawful assembly, committed murder of Rohit Kumar and Pradeep Kumar. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner is implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Vikas Kumar and there is no material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 07.07.2026 in B.A. No. 6268 of 2026. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been in custody since 06.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 and petitioner has no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 18 of the instant bail application and although charge-sheet has already been submitted yet no witness has been examined. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate – 1st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/07/2026 Amar/