Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19535 (HP)

TAMANNA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./779/2026 · 2026-08-06

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:33099 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex.Petition No. 779 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.08.2026 Tamanna Kumari ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. M.A.Safee, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (oral) Respondents have filed compliance affidavit. It has been averred in the compliance affidavit that the judgment dated 21.03.2024 passed in CWP No.8148 of 2022, titled, Yashwant Kumar vs State of HP and others has not attained finality and not implemented by the respondent-Department till date, as the same is challenged by way of filing LPA No.316 of 2025 alongwith other connected separate LPAs. 2. It has further been averred that the coordinate Bench of this Court in a similar case, with the similar facts and circumstances, has specifically observed that the authority should have waited for the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:33099 outcome of the LPA filed in Yashwant Kumar’s case and keep the representations pending by seeking extension of time from the Court. 3. Keeping in view the above facts, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the present execution petition at this stage in view of the order dated 24.06.2026, passed in CWP No.9786 of 2026, titled, Vijay Pal Singh and another vs State of Himachal Pradesh and another, wherein, a direction has been given that the representation be decided by the authority in light of the Yashwant Kumar’s case only after the decision in the Letters Patent Appeal by the Hon’ble Division Bench. The Execution petition is accordingly disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file the execution petition after the decision in the Letters Patent Appeal. Pending miscellaneous application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) Judge August 06, 2026 (meera)