Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19535 (BOM)

MAKRAND DEEPAKRAO BALSURKAR (KULKARNI) AND OTHERS v. RAGINI MAKRAND BALSURKAR (KULKARNI) AND ANOTHER

WP/350/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NOB-3-WP-350-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 350 OF 2026 MAKRAND DEEPAKRAO BALSURKAR (KULKARNI) AND OTHERS VERSUS RAGINI MAKRAND BALSURKAR (KULKARNI) AND ANOTHER ….. Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. P. V. Barde ..... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 06th OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicants submits that during pendency of this writ petition, there were certain interim directions issued by this Court, directing the applicants to deposit an amount of Rs.66,000/- per month to the wife towards her maintenance. He submits that, the said amount has been regularly paid by the applicants. He further submits that, final outcome of the proceedings are that the maintenance of Rs.22,000/- per month has been granted by the learned Trial Court to the respondent – wife as an by way of final maintenance amount. He submits that, he will pay the said maintenance amount as directed by the learned Trial Court hereinafter. However, the original dues as on today is calculated approximately Rs.3,00,000/-. He submits that, in addition to Rs.22,000/- per month, which is her maintenance granted by the learned Trial Court, he will be pay additional amount of Rs.22,000/- so as to make up the dues which are as on today. Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:47816 -2- NOB-3-WP-350-2026 3. The offer tendered by the learned Advocate for applicants seems to be reasonable. The applicants are directed to pay Rs.22,000/- per month as maintenance granted to respondent no.2 wife regularly hereinafter. In addition to that, as stated by the applicants themselves Rs.22,000/- per month will be paid to respondent no.2 wife till Rs.3,00,000/- due is recovered. 4. In light of this, the present proceedings is disposed of as infructuous (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale