Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1953 (RAJ)

SONU @ SANU S/O POONAMCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/466/2026 · 2026-04-09

Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14893-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole) No. 466/2026 Sonu @ Sanu S/o Poonamchand, R/o Ruparail, Police Station Mandawar, District Jhalawar. Presently Confined At The Central Jail, Shyalawas, Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate, Kota. 3. Superintendent Of The Central Jail, Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anima Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Ms. Neha Goyal & Mr. Aman Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 09/04/2026 This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 06.05.2025 extending him benefit of parole on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- as also two sureties of the like amount seeking modification in it to the effect that instead, he may be extended the benefit only on furnishing the personal bond on account of his poor financial condition. The respondent(s) have, in their reply, admitted that financial condition of the petitioner is poor. In view thereof, this criminal writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:- [2026:RJ-JP:14893-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-466/2026] 1. The order impugned dated 06.05.2025 qua the petitioner is modified in terms that he shall be released on parole only on furnishing personal bond. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Ritu/32