Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19528 (BOM)

RAHUL PRAKASH GUDIWAL v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AURANGABAD.

CP/71/2014 · 2026-10-06

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2014 RAHUL PRAKASH GUDIWAL VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AURANGABAD. ... Adv. Amjad Pathan h/f Adv. R. D. Biradar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 06/10/2026 Per Court: . The direction was given as per the order under contempt to the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, to decide the representation dated 23.07.2013 submitted by the petitioner, but it appears that under the said representation the petitioner had sought certain action against the erring Constable of Cantonment Police Station, who favoured the rival party of the petitioner. 2. However, a crime was registered in that respect and ultimately ‘B-Summary’ was also filed, as stated by the learned APP, on instructions. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:47314-DB