Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19527 (CHH)

MOHAMMED SAMEER v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4186/2026 · 2026-05-13

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22843 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4186 of 2026 1 - Mohammed Sameer S/o Late Abdul Razzak, Aged About 29 Years Permanent Add. House No. 46/660, Gole Bazar, Peti Line, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Present Address Byron Bazar, Janta Colony, Near R.S. Apartment, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Raipur Development Authority Through The Chief Executive Officer Indrawati Bhawan, Block B, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Raipur Development Authority Through The Chief Executive Officer, 2nd Floor, Bhaktmata Karma Vyavasayik Parisar, New Rajendra Nagr, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492006 ..Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Addl. A.G. For Respondents/RDA : Mr. Animesh Verma, Advocate AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.05.14 18:54:47 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 14/05/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “(a) Issue appropriate writ/direction to the respondents, especially the respondent No. 2-RDA to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. (b) Direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation/application including the reminder of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment within a stipulated period of time. (c) Grant compensation and cost of the petition to the petitioner in the interest of justice. (d) Any other relief that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the present facts and circumstances of this case, may also kindly be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that after the death of the petitioner’s father, immediately in the year 2023, the petitioner has submitted an application for grant of compassionate appointment, however, the same has not been decided till date. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/RDA submits that if the said application for compassionate appointment filed by the petitioner is still pending, the same shall be considered and necessary order will be passed, within a period of thirty days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the 3 pleadings and documents. 5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for respondents/RDA, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents/RDA to consider the petitioner’s application for compassionate appointment and pass a necessary order, within a period of 30 days from today. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep