Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1952 (BOM)

LAKAPPA SUKHADEV ADGALE AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS AND 4 ORS

WP/1367/2026 · 2026-08-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

64.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1367 OF 2026 Shri. Lakappa Sukhadev Adgale and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents —————— Miss. Shinaa D. Nawanne i/b Mr. Sushant A. Khatake, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : August 11, 2026. P. C. : 1. The petitioner seeks a limited relief to decide the proposal sent for seeking approval to the petitioner’s appointment on 09.10.2025. 2. Learned AGP submits that there is a ban on appointment, and therefore the proposal, even otherwise, cannot be granted approval. 3. It is open for the Education Oicer to decide the proposal in accordance with law and the applicable Government Resolution. The proposal cannot be kept pending without any decision on the same. The Education Oicer is directed to decide the proposal within a period of eight weeks from today. 4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Sameer 1 of 1