( 2026:HHC:34704 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1615 of 2026 Decided on: 17th August, 2026 Naresh Kumar Sood ....Petitioner versus HRTC and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of communication dated 29.07.2026 issued by the Financial Advisor & C.A.O., Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla-171003, which is taken on record. 2. A perusal of aforesaid communication reveals that the remaining amount of Rs.1,34,639/- on account of dearness relief has been disbursed to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest on the aforesaid amount has not been paid. Since the respondents have now paid the remaining amount of Rs.1,34,639/- on account of dearness relief, learned 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:34704 ) 2 counsel for the respondents undertakes to pay the interest, if any, on the aforesaid amount within a period of eight weeks from today. 4. In view of this, the execution petition is closed. However, in case the respondents do not pay to the petitioner the interest on the amount of dearness relief, if any, as per judgment passed by this Court, which is sought to be executed, within a period of eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 5. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 17th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)