APHC010154982026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8520/2026 Between: 1. VINJAVARAPU SATYANARAYANA, S/O. VEERA BRAHMAM AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. 17-8, MARLAPALEM, GANNAVARAM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521101 2. VINJAVARAPU MANGAMMA,, W/O. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. 17-8, MARLAPALEM, GANNAVARAM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521101 3. VAJRALA SIRISHA,, W/O. MAHESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. 14-49-1, TELAPROLU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521109 4. VAJRALA MAHESH,, S/O. GURAVAREDDY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. 14-49-1, TELAPROLU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521109 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT - 534001 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR, KOYYALAGUDEM POLICE STATION 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8520 of 2026 Dated 01.04.2026 KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 534312 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOYYALAGUDEM POLICE STATION KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT- 534312 5. V SAILAJA, W/O. VEERA BRAHMAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. RAMANUJAPURAM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 534312 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): KALAPALA DOONDI MAHARAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more specifically respondent No 3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondentsherein not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent and pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Kalapala Doondi Maharaj, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and Respondent No.5. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8520 of 2026 Dated 01.04.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that on 17.03.2026, Respondent No.5 lodged a report before Respondent No.4. Based on the said report, Respondent No.4 contacted the petitioners over phone to attend the police station for counselling; however, they did not respond or attend. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, it was revealed that civil disputes are pending between the petitioners and Respondent No.5. Thereafter, the police have not interfered in any civil disputes, as alleged by the petitioners. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing Respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to the police station henceforth and not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents without following due process of law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 01.04.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.8520 of 2026 Dated 01.04.2026 149 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8520 of 2026 Date: 01.04.2026 RSI