Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19503 (KAR)

E THIPESWAMY v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/32345/2017 · 2026-06-04

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26656 WP No. 32345 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.32345 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. E. THIPESWAMY S/O LATE ERABOVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O BOGALERA HATTI, AGRICULTURIST, CHITRADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDAPPA B.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT CHITRADURGA-577501. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT CHITRADURGA-577501. 3. THE THASILDHAR CHITHRADURGA DISTRICT CHITRADURGA-577501. 4. SHIVANNA S/O LATE ERABOVI R/O BOGALERAHATTI CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26656 WP No. 32345 of 2017 5. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT THIRAVANURU VILLAGE CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 6. REVENUE INSPECTOR THIRUVANURU HOBL THIRUVANURU CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 7. SHIRASTHEDAR BHOOMIKENDRA TALUK OFFICE, CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, R5 TO R7; SRI. B.P. HONAKHANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 05.07.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DATED 02.08.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 05.07.2017 (Annexure-J) in RA(A)-32/2016-17, passed by - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26656 WP No. 32345 of 2017 respondent No.1 and the order dated 02.08.2016 (Annexure-H) in RA-89/2016-17 passed by respondent No.2. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the petitioner as well as the private respondents are claiming right over the property on the basis of the Will referred to in the Writ Petition and that apart, the suit with regard to the same is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court in O.S.No.22/2017, parties are directed to maintain status-quo with regard to entries in the revenue records as per the order passed by this Court on 08.08.2017 till the conclusion of the proceedings in O.S.No.22/2017, before the competent Civil Court. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61