APHC010155212026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8028/2026 Between: 1. D.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY,, S/O. ADISESHA REDDY,AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. DUVVURIVARIPALEM, DAMMAYAPALEM, MUTHUKURU, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-524344. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY- 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT- 524001 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUTHUKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524001 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUTHUKURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT- 524001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action 2 of the respondents in issuing notice vide proceedings under Sec.7 of land encroachment Act, 1905 in Rc.B.82/2026, Dt. 16.03.2026 and in trying to dispossess and demolish the structurers of the petitioner situated over the land admeasuring an extent of 344 Sq.yards and an extent of 336 Sq yards situated in Sy.No.351/1 and Sy.No.351/2 of Pidathapoluru Village, Muthukuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without giving opportunity of personal hearing as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of AP Land encroachment Act, 1905 besides violation of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not interfere with the petitioners possession of subject land by setting aside the proceedings issued by 4th respondent vide Rc.B.82/2026, Dt.16.03.2026and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the notice issued vide Rc.B.82/2026, Dt.16.03.2026 issued by the 4th respondent including demolition pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed. 2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 24.03.2026 NNN