[2026:RJ-JP:1430] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18741/2025 Jesaram S/o. Nathuram, Resident Of Rulyana Patti, Tehsil Nechwa, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Pannaram, S/o. Boduram 2. Likhmaram, S/o. Boduram 3. Mohanram, S/o. Boduram 4. Rekharam S/o. Boduram, All Residents Of Rulyana Patti, Tehsil Nechwa, District Sikar (Raj.) 5. Baluram, S/o. Chetaram 6. Gopiram S/o. Nathuram, Residents Of Rulyana Patti, Tehsil Nechwa, District Sikar (Raj.) 7. Teshildar Nechwa, Tehsil Nechwa, District Sikar. 8. Patwari Halka Bhilunda, Tehsil Nechwa, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shovit Jhajharia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with a limited prayer that the learned Board of Revenue may be directed to decide the pending revision petition No.T.A.5266/2024 titled as Pannaram and Ors. Vs. Baluram and Ors. expeditiously within a period of one month. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit of the petitioner was dismissed in default, and a restoration application was rejected on 01.08.2023 against the said order. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Revenue Appellate Authority and the learned Revenue Appellate Authority vide order dated 18.07.2024, allowed the appeal and restored the suit to its original number. 3. Being aggrieved by the order dated 18.07.2024, the revision petition was preferred by the respondents, and the record of the [2026:RJ-JP:1430] (2 of 2) [CW-18741/2025] court below has also been summoned, yet the hearing of the revision petition is being delayed for one reason or another. He further submits that due to the pendency of the revision petition, and the calling of the record, the suit proceedings are lying at a standstill, therefore, a direction may be issued to the learned Board of Revenue to decide the pending revision petition expeditiously within a period of one month. 4. Heard and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that the suit of the petitioner was dismissed in default and restoration application was rejected on 01.08.2023, thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Revenue Authority upon which the learned Revenue Appellate Authority allowed the appeal and restored the suit to its original number; being aggrieved of which the respondents filed a revision petition, wherein the learned Board of Revenue has called for the record of the proceedings of the main suit, because of which the proceedings of the main suit has been virtually paralysed and lying at a standstill. 6. Therefore, the learned Board of Revenue is directed to decide the pending revision petition No.T.A.5266/2024 titled Pannaram and Ors. Vs. Baluram and Ors. within a period of two months from the next date fixed in the revision petition. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /228-S