HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 10/2026 CrlM No. 17/2026 Rajinder Paul …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Idress Saleem Dar, Advocate Vs Sunita Devi .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 12.01.2026 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order impugned is amenable to the revisional jurisdiction before the Sessions Court and that he has all the liberty to avail the grievance in assail to the order impugned. He further submits that he would not press this petition and would take liberty to approach Sessions Court at the first instance, this is validly taken on record. Consequently, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy, as provided under the Code in assail to order dated 22.09.2025. (Sanjay Parihar) Judge Jammu 12.01.2026 Mihul Sr. No. 41