Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19497 (CHH)

MUNESHWAR MANIKPURI v. SHOBHA GHOSH

MAC/908/2025 · 2026-05-05

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21228 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 908 of 2025 1 - Muneshwar Manikpuri S/o Shri Shankar Ram Aged About 27 Years Resident Of Village- Bisahi Podi, Police Station- Bhatgaon, District- Surajpur (C.G.)(Driver Of Motorcycle Bajaj Platina No. Cg-15-Cw-1846). 2 - Ramdhani Manikpuri S/o Gambhir Manikpuri Aged About 47 Years Resident Of Dharampur, Police Station- Bhatgaon, District- Surajpur (C.G.) (Owner Of Motorcycle Bajaj Platina No. C.G.-15-Cw-1846). ... Appellants versus 1 - Shobha Ghosh W/o Late Vishwanath Ghosh Aged About 52 Years Resident Of Ghoshpara Subhashnagar, Ambikapur, Bhagwanpur, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). 2 - Rupversha Ghosh D/o Late Vishwanath Ghosh Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Ghoshpara Subhashnagar, Ambikapur, Bhagwanpur, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). ... Respondents For Appellants : None For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shubhangi Varshney, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 06/05/2026 1. On 13.03.2026, the matter was listed for hearing but no one appeared AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.05.14 19:42:26 +0530 2 nor any representation was made. Thereafter, on 29.04.2026 the matter was listed for hearing and on that day, this Court has directed that if no representation is made on behalf of the appellants on the next date of hearing, this Court may pass appropriate orders. Today when the matter is called, no one appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants does not want to prosecute the present appeal. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput ) Judge Ami