Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19492 (DEL)

SYED HABEEB UR REHMAN PRIVATE TRUST & ORS. v. MR KHALEEL SYED REHMAN AND ORS.

FAO(OS)/2/2026 · 2026-09-24

Nisha Sahay Saxena, Vivek Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011086362025 + FAO(OS) 2/2026 & CM APPL. 2323/2026 SYED HABEEB UR REHMAN PRIVATE TRUST & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Varun Sharma, Ms. Aditi Anup, Mr. Pankaj Tripathi, Mr. Siddharth Bajaj, Advs. versus MR KHALEEL SYED REHMAN AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Hoda, Ms. Esha Bakshi, Mr. Kamran Khan, Mr. Shahrukh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Ms. Ayesha Khan, Mr. Surya Kiran Singh, Mr. Aviral Jain, Advs. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA SAHAY SAXENA O R D E R % 24.09.2026 1. The present appeal has been filed under Order XLIII Rule 1(R) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. no. 2013/2025 in CS (OS) no. 50/2025 titled “Mr. Khaleel Syed Rehman v. Syed Habeeb Ur Rehman Private Trust And Ors.”, whereby learned Single Judge has, inter alia, directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to all movable and immovable assets of the late Mr. Syed Habeeb Ur Rehman (“Deceased”). 2. Learned senior counsel for the appellants submits that the only This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:32:24 grievance of the appellants is that the observations made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order shall not come in the way of appellants at the stage of final hearing of the matter. He further submits that, subject to the aforesaid observations not coming in the way of the appellants at the stage of final hearing of the matter and not being taken into consideration by the concerned Court, he seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the same. 4. We find that since the order impugned before us is an interim injunction order only, any observations made or finding given therein cannot, in any manner, come in the way of the parties at the stage of final hearing of the matter. 5. Therefore, with the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application also stands disposed of. 6. Interim order, if any, also stands vacated. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J NISHA SAHAY SAXENA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/r/tr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:32:24