[2026:RJ-JP:1410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14676/2025 Satnam S/o Jagtar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ladamka, Police Station Khuskheda, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined At Sub Jail, Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Aslam S. Khan, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.202/2025, registered at Police Station Khuskheda, District Khairthal-Tijara (Bhiwadi), for the offence(s) under Sections 64(2)(m), 351(2) and 351(3) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the FIR was filed with an inordinate delay and charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix were in a consensual relationship and the victim is major lady. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner on pretext of circulating the obscene photographs committed rape with the prosecutrix, however, no [2026:RJ-JP:1410] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14676/2025] such documents/evidence was recovered from the petitioner's Mobile Phones and the prosecutrix has denied to get herself examine regarding the commission of rape. The petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the contents of the charge- sheet, without expressing anything on the merits of the case and after considering the petitioner's long incarceration, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Satnam S/o Jagtar, in connection with FIR No.202/2025, registered at Police Station Khuskheda, District Khairthal-Tijara (Bhiwadi), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-258