Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19490 (JHR)

JITENDRA KUMAR ALIAS JITENDRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6302/2026 · 2026-07-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20167] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6302 of 2026 ------ Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra aged about 25 years son of Manoj Verma, resident of Sector-8/B, Jhopri Near Harla P.S. P.O. Sector- 9, P.S. Harla, District Bokaro, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-08-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Harla P.S. Case No.92 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.995 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109, 118 (2), 3 (5) and 61 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons and in criminal conspiracy with them, attempted to murder the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that for the self-same occurrence, the petitioner himself has filed Harla P.S. Case No.84 of 2024 and for the self-same occurrence Complaint Case No.1189 of 2024 was filed by the informant after much delay on 12.08.2024 which upon being referred to police under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C., this case has been registered. It is further submitted that the informant was the aggressor party and the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the informant vehemently oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bokaro in connection with Harla P.S. Case No.92 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.995 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-08.07.2026-Animesh/