RAMCHANDRA SON OF SHRI KANHAIYA LAL v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JAIPUR
CW/17492/2025 · 2026-01-09
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19489 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19489 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:734] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17492/2025
1. Ramchandra Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal,
2. Laxminarayan Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, both are Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Through Secretary, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Raj.
2. Mojika Real Estate And Developers Pvt. Ltd., Through Director, Durga Prasad Agrawal, Address Mojika Dream Point, 401-402, Janana Hospital Ke Samne, Subhash Nagar, Jaipur. Under Construct Building Office Khasra No. 69/213, 61 To 68 Chak Salagrampura, Post Vidhani, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents
3. Bhairulal Son Of Son Of Shri Kanhaiyalal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
4. Ramesh Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
5. Prabhu Dayal Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
6. Krishn Kumar Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
7. Gulab Devi Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
8. Mamta Devi Yadav Daughter Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 09/01/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:734] (2 of 2) [CW-17492/2025]
1.
Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing the matter at some length, upon instructions from his client, submits that petitioners do not wish to pursue the present writ petition on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to pursue the application filed by the petitioners under Section 54-D of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982 before the Jaipur Development Authority.
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
4. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh writ petition, if need so arises.
5. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /5