Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19489 (KAR)

SMT. VATSALA v. SRI. SRIDHAR R

RFA/2407/2025 · 2026-06-05

Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2407 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. VATSALA R. D/O. LATE P.V.RAMCHANDRAN, AGED 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.557, OPP. SARJAPUR ROAD, KPC LAYOUT, KASAVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 035. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B. S. RAGHU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SRIDHAR R S/O. LATE P.V.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.213, 5TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI 5TH STAGE, BENGALURU-560 061. Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025 2. SMT. LATHA R, D/O. LATE P.V.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, 3RD CROSS, 6TH CROSS AGS LAYOUT BANASHANKRI BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN, ADV. FOR R2; V/C/O DTD:27.01.2026 NOTICE TO R1 IS DESPENSED WITH) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2025 PASSED IN FDP NO.162/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo to that effect. The memo reads as under; "The undersigned Appellant of the above case prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit her to withdraw the above appeal as she has negotiated and settled with the respondents to deal with the suit schedule property in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13