APHC010154402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 884/2025 Between: 1. VOCATIONAL LAB ATTENDERS ASSOCIATION, INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, AMARAVATHI, A.P D. NO.26-18-22, KANKARAGUNTA GATE, MASZID ST., GUNTUR-522004, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SUDI SUBBARAMAIAH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SMT KRITHIKA SHUKLA, COMMISSIONEROF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ,4TH LINE, LAKSHMIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondents and to punish under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of the order dated 26.06.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11837 of 2024 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2025 ORDER: This Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to examine the petitioner’s representations dated 27.06.2023 and 12.03.2024 and pass appropriate orders and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for respondents stated that respondents have examined the representations and rejected the claim of the petitioner and the petitioner herein filed W.P.No.24984 of 2025, challenging the rejection order. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, nothing survives in the contempt case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner repeatedly asking adjournments. 4. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) payable by the petitioner to the Andhra Pradesh High Court Employees Association within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Failing which, Registry is directed to take steps for realization of the amount. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.03.2026 KBN 4 53 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.884 of 2025 06.03.2026 KKBBNN