HARSH SAH @ HARSH SHA @ HARSH SHAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6303/2026 · 2026-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19485 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19485 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20165] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6303 of 2026
------ Harsh Sah @ Harsh Sha @ Harsh Shah, aged about 24 years, son of Vijay Shah, resident of C/o Maa Jagdamba Sweet, Lower Hatia, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Kaushalesh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III
Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA III
------
Order No.02 Dated-08-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.266 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 316(3), 318(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons obtained a loan from State Bank of India by submitting forged documents claiming to be government employees. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the loan amount taken by the co-accused Md. Jainul Aawedin Ansari who has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.2218 of 2026, has repaid the loan amount to the bank. It is also submitted that the allegations, at best, make out a case of civil dispute. It is then submitted that the
petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Ranchi in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.266 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-08.07.2026-Animesh/