Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19482 (BOM)

RATANSHEKHAR RAICHAND DOSHI AND OTHERS v. SHILPA NIKHIL DOSHI AND ANOTHER

APPLN/4273/2013 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 928-APPLN-4273-2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.43 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4273 OF 2013 IN WP/43/2012 RATANSHEKHAR RAICHAND DOSHI AND OTHERS VERSUS SHILPA NIKHIL DOSHI AND ANOTHER ...... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Anil H. Kasliwal Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V. B. Deshmukh APP for Respondent No.2 - State : Mr. S. V. Hange ...... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 06th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, the parties have already compromised the dispute among themselves, and accordingly, the original proceedings from which the present petition arises has become infructuous. Learned Advocate tenders a copy of the order passed by the learned Trial Court along with a copy of the decree dated 13.03.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court. The decree is taken on record and marked as Exhibit “X” for the purpose of identification. 2. In view of the fact that the original proceeding itself has been decreed on the ground of compromise between the parties, nothing survives in the present petition. 3. The Writ Petition and Criminal Application are disposed of as infructuous. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:47444