[2026:RJ-JP:4997-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18620/2023 Dr. Dhruv Singh Meena S/o Shri Jai Singh Meena, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of 3- Mb 476, Indra Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 3. The Principal And Controller, Sms Medical College And Affiliated Group Of Hospitals, Jaipur 4. Head Of The Department, Forensic Medicine Department, Sms Medical College, Jaipur ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 83/2022 Dr. Ashok Saini S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Saini, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Chaulayi Kothi, Radha Swami Bagh, Village Jetpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Director (Public And Health), Directorate Of Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. The Neet Pg Admission / Counseling Board-2021, Through Chairman, Government Dental College (Ruhs College Of Dental Sciences), Subhash Nagar, Behind T.b. Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 5. National Medical Commission, Through Its Secretary, [2026:RJ-JP:4997-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-18620/2023] Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-I, New Delhi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahmad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Angad Mirdha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 03/02/2026 1. These matters pertain to admission to the Post Graduate Course. Notices were issued to the respondents and interim orders dated 08.11.2023 and 15.03.2022 was passed in favour of the petitioners. 2. It has been informed that during the pendency of these writ petitions, the course has already been completed in one matter and another matter is likely to be completed very soon. 3. In view of the above, both the writ petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous. The question of law is kept open. 4. The interim orders dated 08.11.2023 and 15.03.2022 passed by this Court is made absolute. 5. A copy of this order be separately placed in the connected file. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J PAYAL DHAWAN /72-73