Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19477 (JHR)

MITHLESH RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3601/2026 · 2026-07-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20150 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3601 of 2026 ------ Mithlesh Ram, age 27 years, son of Karma Ram, resident of Village and P.O. Puso, P.S. Sisai, District Gumla, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Anish Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/08.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with S.T. No.95 of 2026 arising out of Sisai P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 310(2) and 311 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gumla. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused. He next submits that the co-accused persons have already been provided privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos.2773, 2775 and 1426 of 2026. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the CDR reveals that this petitioner was in constant touch with the other accused persons. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. It transpires from two orders of the coordinate Bench that except the CDR and the confessional statement of the other co-accused, there is nothing against this petitioner and further in identical situation, two of the co-accused have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench in the aforementioned A.B.As. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:20150 7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gumla, in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 08.07.2026 Anit Uploaded 09.07.2026