Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19476 (KAR)

SMT. TRIVENI .C v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/44035/2019 · 2026-06-03

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26229 WP No. 44035 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 44035 OF 2019 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. TRIVENI .C W/O MOHAN RAJ URS C G AGED 45 YEARS, R/AT C/I VIJAYAKRISHNA "SRILAKSHMIVENKATESHWARA NILAYA" NEAR NDRK COLLEGE KUVEMPU NAGAR, 2ND STAGE, HASSAN-573201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHU PRASAD B S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. CHIEF EXECUTING OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH B M ROAD, HASSAN-573201 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER ALUR TALUK Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26229 WP No. 44035 of 2019 3. ALUR TALUK PANCHAYATH HASSAN DISTRICT-573213 4. GRAM PANCHAYATH MADABALU ALUR TALUK, HALAYA HOBLI HASSAN-573213 REPRESENTED BY PDO 5. SRI. M.S. BASAVARAJU, S/O SRI. NIRWANE GOWDA, CLERK/DATA ENTRY OPERATOR, MADABALU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ALURU TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 SRI. A NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4 R2 SERVED SRI. B.O. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITOENR VIDE ANNEXURE-H DATED 25.02.2019; QUASH THE RESOLUTION OF THE R-4 AND PRODUCED AT ANENXURE-J TO THE WRIT PETITON PROPOSING TO RECOMMEND THE NAME OF ANY INELIGIBLE PERSON BASAVARAJU CLERK TO THE POST OF COMPUTER OPERATOR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26229 WP No. 44035 of 2019 ORAL ORDER After hearing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondents. 2. The memo and submission are placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner makes a representation to the respondents, the respondents are directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within one month from the date of submission of the representation. 4. Pending interlocutory application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66