1 APHC010152932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 536/2018 Between: 1. MEESALA MOHAN PAPARAO, WORKING AS ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER (TECHINICAL) 0/0 THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (OPERATION) ELURU,VIDYUTH BHAVAN, W.G.DISTRICT, N.R.PETA, ELURU, STATE OF A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI H Y DORA, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LIMITED (APEPDCL), VISAKHAPATNAM, SEETAMMADHARA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. STATE OF A.P. 2. SRI AJAY JAIN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAVARATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI P NAGESWARA RAO, CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRD), APEPDCL, SEETHAMMADHARA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SRI CH SATYANARAYANA REDDY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (OPERATION) APEPDCL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI K NAGESWARA RAO, DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION APEPDCL, ELURU, WEST GODAVRI DISTRICT. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents for wilful disobedance of the orders passed in WPMP.No. 17652 of 2017 dated 5-6-2017 by his Lordship Hon'ble Sri Justice MS Ramachandra Rao, under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) 2. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 536 of 2018 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 05.06.2017 in W.P.M.P.No.21546 of 2017 in W.P.No.17652 of 2017. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up, Sri Satya Dev, learned counsel representing Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.03.2026 ASR 4 42 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 536 of 2018 03.03.2026 ASR