MD. NISAR ANSARI @ JAYKANT SHIKERE @ NISAR ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6341/2026 · 2026-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19471 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19471 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:20106 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6341 of 2026
------ Md. Nisar Ansari @ Jaykant Shikere @ Nisar Ansari, aged about 38 years, s/o Mumtaz Ansari, r/o Kusunda Hazra Basti near Kusunda Station, P.O.-Kusunda & P.S.-Kenduadih, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate
: Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate
: Mr. Suman Saurav, Advocate
: Ms. Jagriti, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 08.07.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.73 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(3)/ 111(4)/ 308(4)/ 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of organized gang of criminals of Prince Khan @ Chhote Sarkar gang and was making ransom call to the informant over phone. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused- Devanand Singh @ Chandan Singh. It is also submitted that there is no allegation of payment of any ransom amount and the petitioner is an ailing person. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next
submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.73 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
08.07.2026 Gunjan-