Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19470 (AP)

Yellapu Swamy Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6613/2019 · 2026-03-30

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010152482019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6613/2019 Between: 1. YELLAPU SWAMY NAIDU, S/O. YELLAPU JAGGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTANNAVARAPU VILLAGE, PENDURTHY MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, NH-16, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, .ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHY NLANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 JS,J W.P.No.6613/2019 respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 10- 12-2014 and 31-10-2017 made to the 3rd and 4th respondents as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 3007,A of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in the Land Acquisi-ion of NH-16 at Pendurthy Village to the extent of petitioner's land, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.6613/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not made any application under Section 6A of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for mutation. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application under Form-6A, Section 6A of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for mutation, within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon filing such application along with all necessary documents, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders by providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within three (3) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 31.03.2026 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.6613/2019 226 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6613/2019 Dated: 31.03.2026 RSD