APHC010138872026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7608/2026 Between: 1. SRIKAKOLLU RAMBABU,, S/O. ISTARAYYA, MALE, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-3, DURGAMMA COLONY, BANDAMCHERLA VILLAGE, T NARASAPURAM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT - 534467 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU - 534001 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT - 534447 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, T NARASAPURAM MANDAL, T NARASAPURAM, ELURU DISTRICT - 534467 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the 2 action of the respondents in not conducting survey to my land an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in R.S.No.225/6 and an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in R.S.No.228/7 in total Ac. 1.55 cents in Bandamcherla Village, T. Narasapuram Mandal, Eluru District basing on my F-Line Application vide Application No.FSNV012500699894 and throwing blame on not cooperating for survey as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of The Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, and its rules framed there under and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to conduct survey to my land an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in R.S.No.225/6 and an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in R.S.No.228/7 in total Ac.1.55 cents in Bandamcherla Village, T. Narasapuram Mandal, Eluru District basing on my F-Line Application vide Application No.FSNV012500699894 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to take steps for conducting survey to my land an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in R.S.No.225/6 and an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in R.S.No.228/7 in total Ac.1.55 cents in Bandamcherla Village, T. Narasapuram Mandal, Eluru District pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANTAM VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not conducting survey of the land in an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in R.S.No.225/6 and an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in R.S.No.228/7 in total Ac.1.55 cents in Bandamcherla Village, T.Narasapuram Mandal, Eluru District basing on the F-line application and throwing blame on the petitioner as he is not cooperating for survey. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.05.2026 submits that pursuant to the report submitted by the Mandal Surveyor, T.Narasapuram dated 19.04.2025, the Deputy Tahsildar, T.Narasapuram issued order in Roc.No.FL/311600/2025, dated 01.05.2025 duly rejecting F-line application of the petitioner and uploaded the same in the online web portal. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.05.2026 no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, the petitioner is given liberty to assail the rejection order of the Deputy Tahsildar dated 01.05.2025 if so warranted and if so advised. 4 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.05.2026 shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 06.05.2026 NNN