MD. SIRAJ ANSARI @ MD. SERAJ ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6273/2026 · 2026-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19467 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19467 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20110] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6273 of 2026
------ Md. Siraj Ansari @ Md. Seraj Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Jahangir Ansari, resident of Village Paharpura, Tetaiya Kala, Tola Tetaria, P.O. and P.S. Jhajha, District Jamui (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kr. Deo, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-08-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.66 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1- A), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted bag of the informant containing jewelleries. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him under T.I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted the petitioner has been in custody since 09.04.2026 as mentioned in para- 13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-XXI, Ranchi in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.66 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 08.07.2026 Saroj/