Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19466 (AP)

C.Madhu Mohan, S/o C.Naganathappa v. The Project Director

WP/21788/2013 · 2026-03-02

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.21788_2013 APHC010150552013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21788/2013 Between: 1. C.MADHU MOHAN, S/O C.NAGANATHAPPA, HINDU, OCC: R/O. MITTAPALLI VILLAGE, RAMA KUPPAM POST & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWMA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT SECRETARY, CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, APARD, AMR-APARD, CAMPUS, RAJENDRANAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in removing the petitioner, who worked as a Field Assistant in the office of the 3rd respondent by his proceedings No.K6/2641/2013, dated: 07.06.2013 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the order passed by the 1st respondent vide proceedings No.K6/2641/2013, dated: 07.06.2013, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 26700 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.K6/2641/2013, dated: 07.06.2013 issued by the 1st respondent by continuing the petitioner as Field Assistant in the office of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2 HN, J W.P.No.21788_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive any further for adjudication and became infructuous. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:03.03.2026 NKA 3 HN, J W.P.No.21788_2013 194 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21788 of 2013 Date: 03.03.2026 NKA