INDIAN MISSION OF MEDICAL SCIENCES SOCIETY v. UNION OF INDIA
SAW/653/2024 · 2026-01-16
Sangeeta Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19461 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19461 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1830-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 653/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15646/2024
1. Indian Mission Of Medical Sciences Society, Through Its President Dr. Rajendra Kumar Agarwal Son Of Shri Lal Agarwal, Having Registered Office At House No. 11-A, Talwandi, Kota (Rajasthan).
2. Sudha Medical College, Through Its Principal And Controller, Having Registered Office At 128, Gram Umaidpura, Via Jagpura, Tehsil Ladpura, Jhalawar, NH-52, Kota-325003. ----Appellants-Petitioners Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Government Of India (Medical Education-I), New Delhi.
2. National Medical Commission, Through Its General Secretary, Having Registered Office At Aiwan-E-Galib Market, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-I, New Delhi.
3. Medical Assessment And Rating Board (Marb), Through Its President Having Registered Office At Aiwan-E-Galib Market, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-I, New Delhi.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department (Grade-I), Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Registrar, Having Registered Office At Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302035. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, ASG (through V.C) with Mr. Devesh Yadav Mr. Kunal Sharma Ms. Niti Jain Bhandari
[2026:RJ-JP:1830-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-653/2024] Mr. Sankalp Vijay, AAAG Mr. Priyesh Agarwal Mr. Kshitiz Jain Mr. Angad Mirdha HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/01/2026 Upon instructions, learned counsel for the appellants does not wish to press the present appeal. Accordingly, the present Special Appeal (Writ) is dismissed as not pressed. We leave the question of law open to be adjudicated in any other case.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ AMIT/1