Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19459 (KAR)

IDBI BANK LTD v. SRI BASAVARAJ

WP/16021/2024 · 2026-06-03

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25988-DB WP No. 16021 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO.16021 OF 2024 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. IDBI BANK LTD RETAIL RECOVERY IDBI HOUSE 58, MISSION ROAD BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER …PETITIONER (BY SRI T P MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI BASAVARAJ S/O JAMBANNA HOUSE NO.128, WARD NO.1 CHAGANUR VILLAGE BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN-583 111 2. THE WAREHOUSE MANAGER KARNATAKA WAREHOUSE CORPORATION STATE WAREHOUSE UNIT-1 KIADB, BALLARI-573 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY MS. ANITHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI JAGADEESHA B N, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25988-DB WP No. 16021 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER DATED 24.11.2023 IN APPEAL NOS.275-283/2018 INSOFAR AS RESPONDENT NO.1 IN APPEAL NO.282/2018 AND RESPONDENT NO.2 IN APPEAL NOS.275- 283/2018 ARE CONCERNED ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH) AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 24.11.2023 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the State Commission') in Appeal Nos.275 to 283/2018. 2. Under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the petitioner has an efficacious alternate remedy to challenge the order passed by the State Commission before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the National Commission'). Instead of approaching the National Commission, the petitioner has approached this Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25988-DB WP No. 16021 of 2024 3. In view of the efficacious statutory remedy available to the petitioner under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, we dismiss this writ petition as not maintainable. Interim order granted on 10.07.2024 shall remain in operation for a period of six weeks. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE BKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8