Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19458 (KAR)

PRAKASH. R. M. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1207/2024 · 2026-06-04

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26594 WP No. 1207 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 1207 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. PRAKASH R. M. S/O MARUTHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 2. LEELAVATHI W/O R.M. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. SANTHOSH P. S/O MARUTHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O NO.1A, SRIDEVI LAYOUT, MEDRAHALLI, CHIKKABANAVARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 090. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.N. BHAT, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26594 WP No. 1207 of 2024 2. RECOVERY OFFICER, REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, FIRST DIVISON, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. BASAVESHWARANAGARA CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,(R), (A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959) NO.159/J, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079, REP. BY RECOVER OFFICER, SRI. K.B. ESHWARAIAH. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. S.J. PURANIK, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE EXECUTION NOTICE DATED 11.09.2023 BEARING NO.BNCCSL/201/2023-24 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ATTACHMENT WARRANT DATED NIL, BEARING NO.NIL ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26594 WP No. 1207 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54