Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19458 (CHH)

RATNU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2296/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21546 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2296 of 2026 1 - Ratnu S/o Dhunaram Aged About 76 Years R/o -Village Barhaguda Tehsil Chandrapur, District -Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 – Collector Sakti District Sakti C.G. 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhra Distirct Sakti C.G. 5 - Tahsildar Chandrapur, District Sakti C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Pranjal Agarwal, Advocate. For State/Res(s) : Shri Anand Dadariya, Dy AG. Hon'ble Mr. Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 08/05/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents for correction of entries of paddy registration. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for taking decision on representation within time frame. 10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner..” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s land has been AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.05.11 14:49:49 +0530 2 submerged in the Kalma Baraj Project, as such, the amount which has been deposited in his account as bonus for cultivating paddy is not in accordance with law; it has been granted to the petitioner due to non-correction of revenue records by the concerned Tahsildar, as such, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking relief that the concerned Tahsildar may be directed to correct the revenue records deleting name of petitioner in revenue records, while correcting the entries of petitioner’s name in respect of land bearing khasra No.980/6 (admeasuring area 0.08 acre) situated at Village Chandrapur, District-Sakti, as the petitioner has never sold any paddy. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that if any application of petitioner is pending, same will be considered and decided as per law, expeditiously. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the records enclosed along with the writ petition. 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of directing the concerned Tahsildar to correct the revenue records while deleting name of petitioner in respect of land bearing khasra No.980/6 (admeasuring area 0.08 acre) situated at Village Chandrapur, District-Sakti. 6. The petitioner is directed to refund the amount received by him towards bonus in respect of the aforesaid land, in the event such amount has been credited to his account. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash