DR. DIWAN SINGH S/O SHRI NATHOLI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19036/2023 · 2026-02-12
Anand Sharma
Special Leave Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19456 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19456 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6690] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19036/2023 Dr. Diwan Singh S/o Shri Natholi Ram, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Targaon, Post Ghantali, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur-321409 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Bhartiya Chikitsa And Ayurved Department, Government Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director, Ayurved Department, Ajmer (Raj.)
3. The Dy. Director (Jaipur-B), Bhartiya Chikitsa And Ayurved Department, Ayush Bhawan, Nri Circle, Sector- 26, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sarah Parveen, Adv. for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Karishma Soni, Adv. for Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC Mr. Shubham Gupta, Adv. for Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 12/02/2026
1. Application for early listing is allowed.
2. With the consent of the parties, the matter was heard finally.
3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by judgment dated 11.11.2025 passed by the Division Bench of
[2026:RJ-JP:6690] (2 of 2) [CW-19036/2023] this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the batch of matters led by D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.928/2023 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Pawan Kumar Sharma).
2. However, learned Government Counsel submits that the State Government has filed SLP before Hon’ble Supreme Court against judgment dated 11.11.2025.
3. In view of the consensus arrived at between learned counsel for the parties regarding applicability of judgment dated 11.11.2025 in the instant writ petition, the writ petition is
disposed of with the same terms and directions as are given in
judgment dated 11.11.2025.
4. It goes without saying that this order shall remain subject to decision of SLP (C) No.006428/2026.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /90