Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19452 (AP)

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. SRI .VIVEK YADAV, IAS

CC/1957/2023 · 2026-03-11

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010150802023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1957/2023 Between: 1. HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, (REGD), THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT A.VENU GOPAL RAO, HIGH COURT BUILDING NELAPADU, AMARAVATI ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VIVEK YADAV IAS, Commissioner Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Centre Vijayawada. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent in accordance with the law for violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 21.09.2022 in I.A.No. 1 of W.P.No. 28597 of 2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent to implement the order passed by this Hon'ble court dated 21.09.2022 in I.A.No. 1 of W.P.No. 28597 of 2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following Order: 1. This contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the Interim orders dated 21.09.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.28597 of 2022. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has complied with the orders dated 21.09.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.28597 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :12.03.2026 JLSR