Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19451 (RAJ)

M/S TECH MARTZ PLUS SACHDEVA ELECTRICALS JOINT VENTURE v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18493/2025 · 2026-01-07

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:373] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18493/2025 M/s Tech Martz Plus Sachdeva Electricals Joint Venture, Having Its Registered Office At G-2, Shubham Complex, 11 A Kumbha Marg, New Fatehpura, Udaipur (Raj.) 313001 Through Its Authorised Signatory Shri Sandeep Gupta, Residing At 101, Shiva Residency, Shiv Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur (Raj.) 302016 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Local Self Bodies, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur-302005 (Rajasthan) 2. The Director And Special Secretary, Local Bodies Department, G-3, Rajmahal Residencial Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-302005, Rajasthan 3. Chief Engineer (Elec.), Local Bodies Department, G-3, Rajmahal Residencial Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-302005, Rajasthan 4. The Commissioner, Nagar Palika, Nathdwara Sukhadiya Nagar, Nathdwara-313301, District- Rajsamand ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Thakuria For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 07/01/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has limited his submissions to the extent that the petitioner be permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances as raised in the writ petition with the further prayer that the respondents be directed to decide the same within the stipulated time. [2026:RJ-JP:373] (2 of 2) [CW-18493/2025] Considering the limited prayer so made, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of 15 days from today and in the event of the same being filed, the respondent No.2 would decide the same after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Needless to say, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the Court for any grievance, if so survives. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /09