Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19446 (JHR)

BINOD BHUIYAN @ BINOD BHARTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6294/2026 · 2026-07-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20161] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6294 of 2026 ------ Binod Bhuiyan @ Binod Bharti, aged about 39 years, Son of – Dukhharan Bhuiyan Resident of Village- Chatania, P.O.- Karma, P.S.- Bashistngar, District- Chatra, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-08-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with B Nagar P.S. Case No.44 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238 (a), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of Binod Ganjhu and caused disappearance of the evidence of the murder by throwing the dead body of the deceased at a distance of 500 feet. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because of suspicion and there is no eye-witness to the occurrence. It is also submitted that there is no motive attributed to the petitioner for committing the murder. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with B Nagar P.S. Case No.44 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-08.07.2026-Animesh/