1 ( 2026:HHC:33151 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 858 of 2026 Decided on: 07.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Dr. Subrahmanyam Vatasyan ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Dhiman …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent : Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 06.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected vide Office Order dated 28.07.2026. 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:33151 ) 3. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail Office Order dated 28.07.2026, in accordance with law. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 7th August, 2026 Judge (raman)