[2026:RJ-JP:4618] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7657/2025 1. Dinesh Kumar Arora S/o Shri Bhupendra Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Behind New Bijli Board, Suratgarh, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 2. Smt. Soma Devi W/o Late Shri Bindrapal, Aged About 85 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Suratgarh, Sriganganager, Rajasthan. 3. Bhpuendra Arora S/o Shri Mathura Das, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Suratgarh, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Dr. Rajan Agarwal S/o Girish Agarwal, R/o Sirsi Road, Plot No. 127, Akshat Vill Hathoj, Bindayaka, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by Registry are overruled. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.103/2023 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC on the basis of compromise. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially, petitioner No.3 has separately filed SB Cr. Misc. Petition [2026:RJ-JP:4618] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7657/2025] No.2032/2024 for quashing of impugned FIR No.103/2023 on merits, which is pending consideration before this Court. It is submitted that during the pendency of that petition, parties resolved their dispute amicably and executed a compromise-deed in this regard and therefore, the present petition has been filed by the petitioners to quash the impugned FIR No.103/2023. Learned counsel contends that since parties settled their dispute amicably, this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025, directed them to appear before Investigating Officer for verification of compromise. Counsel submits that in such circumstances, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless. The copy of written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor places factual report dated 17.12.2025 received from the SHO, Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West). According to which, parties have settled their dispute amicably and they have entered into compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:4618] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7657/2025] 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.103/2023 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /341