BALRAM YADAV ALIAS NAGA YADAV ALIAS BALRAM KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3593/2026 · 2026-07-08
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:20065 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3593 of 2026
Balram Yadav @ Naga Yadav @ Balram Kumar Yadav, aged about 33 years, son of Fokal Mahto @ Nuneshwar Prasad Yadav, resident of village Udaypura, P.O. and P.S. Rikhiya, District-Deoghar ...... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Pramod Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwary, A.P.P.
02/ 08.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.135 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 125, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 132, 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation has been made against the petitioner of indulging with the police of taking away tractors which was stopped by the police for investigation. He further submits that the petitioner is a poor person and the petitioner is doing the work of labour. He then submits that only on suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated in the case. He next submits that the name of the person, who has taken name of the petitioner, has not been disclosed in the FIR. He also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 11 of this application and co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3010 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of forcefully taking away the tractors from the custody of the police. ( 2026:JHHC:20065 )
5. Considering that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and only on suspicion, the name of the petitioner has come and the name of the person, who has taken petitioner’s name, has not been disclosed in the FIR and co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A. in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.
Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.135 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Dt.08.07.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-