RAMPATI DEVI W/O GANGARAM YOGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13654/2025 · 2026-01-21
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19439 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19439 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2744] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13654/2025 Rampati Devi W/o Gangaram Yogi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Hindwad, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Mad- hopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 21/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-peti- tioner under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 119/2025, registered with the Police Station, Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 352 of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned coun- sel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prose- cutor and also perused the material made available on record.
4. As per the contents of the First Information Report, no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused-peti- tioner for causing any injury to the injured complainant party. The accused-petitioner is a woman and she has been arrayed as an ac-
[2026:RJ-JP:2744] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13654/2025] cused in the First Information Report with the general allegations.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that the ac- cused-petitioner is always ready to join the investigation.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against the present accused-petitioner and more particularly the fact that she is a woman and no specific overt act has been assigned to her in the FIR, this Court deems it just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station, Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur in FIR No. 119/2025, is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner she shall be released on bail, provided that she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to her satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for in interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police offi- cer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previ- ous permission of the Court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /202