APHC010152842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 950/2025 Between: 1. ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, (REGD.NO.H DURGA TEMPLE BUILT ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, D.MOHAMMED S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 1. SHRI SATYAPRAKASH SINGH, CHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) 2. SHRI P R PADGETWAR, GENERAL MANAGER ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful non implementation of the dated 27.02.2024 in W.P.No.33252 of 2013 passed by the Honble Sri Justice Harinath.N, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the p IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 950/2025 ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, (REGD.NO.H -75), DK MUKHARJI BHAVAN, OPP DURGA TEMPLE BUILT-UP CIRCLE, CUDDAPAH - 516001. REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, D.MOHAMMED S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ...PETITIONER AND SHRI SATYAPRAKASH SINGH, CHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) SHRI P R PADGETWAR, GENERAL MANAGER ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) ...CONTEMNOR(S): ions 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful non implementation of the order of the Honble Court dated 27.02.2024 in W.P.No.33252 of 2013 passed by the Honble Sri Justice Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK EMPLOYEES 75), DK MUKHARJI BHAVAN, OPP 516001. REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, D.MOHAMMED S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ...PETITIONER SHRI SATYAPRAKASH SINGH, CHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) SHRI P R PADGETWAR, GENERAL MANAGER ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA (ANDHRA PRADESH) ...CONTEMNOR(S): ions 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the Contempt of Courts order of the Honble Court dated 27.02.2024 in W.P.No.33252 of 2013 passed by the Honble Sri Justice Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated etition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant leave to the petitioner to bring the 2nd respondent herein as party to the present contempt case, pending disposal of the main contempt case. IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V UMA DEVI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank submits that a detailed reply has been filed and that the orders of this Court have been complied with. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner was given multiple opportunities to furnish the required documents, and that despite these opportunities, the applicants failed to submit the appropriate material for establishing their date of initial engagement. Hence, all the applicants are informed that their applications cannot be considered for want of submission of the required documents/material. It is open for the respective applicants to challenge the said proceedings. 3. On these considerations, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 27.02.2026 PNS