Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19433 (KAR)

SMT KANTAMMA K C v. K R SATHYA

RPFC/224/2024 · 2026-06-03

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25949 RPFC No. 224 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 224 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT KANTAMMA K C AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O K. R. SATHYA, R/A NO.1188, BASATTI KOPPAL, NEAR MURARAPPA CHAMBERS, HASSAN - 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. APPANNAGOWDA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: K R SATHYA S/O RANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, CONDUCTOR KSRTC DEPOT, SAKALESHPUR …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.07.2022 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.77/2015 ON THE FILE OF PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HASSAN., DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25949 RPFC No. 224 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. The revision petition was filed in the month of September 2024 and till now office objections are not complied. As per office endorsement, this is the 10th time where the petitioner is called upon to comply the office objections. The petitioner neither represented nor has chosen to comply the office objections. Therefore, the revision petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2