Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19432 (KAR)

IDBI BANK LTD v. SRI K GADILINGAPPA

WP/16416/2024 · 2026-06-01

D K Singh, Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25577-DB WP No. 16416 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 16416 OF 2024 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. IDBI BANK LTD RETAIL RECOVERY IDBI HOUSE 58, MISSION ROAD BENGALURU 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T P MUTHANNA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K GADILINGAPPA S/O HANUMANTAPPA NEAR SUNKALAMMA TEMPLE WARD NO. 1, CHAGANUR VILLAGE BALLARI TQ AND DIST PIN 583 111 2. THE WAREHOUSE MANAGER KARNATAKA WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, STATE WAREHOUSE UNIT -1 KIADB BALLARI 573 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA KIRHSNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25577-DB WP No. 16416 of 2024 ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER DATED 24.11.2023 IN APPEAL No. 281/18 ONLY OUT OF 275 TO 283 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH), ANNEXURE-A, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 28.12.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bellary in C.C.No.126/2017 and the order dated 24.11.2023 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the State Commission') in Appeal No.275 to 283/2018. 2. Under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the petitioner has an efficacious alternate remedy to challenge the order passed by the State Commission before the National Commission. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25577-DB WP No. 16416 of 2024 3. Instead of approaching the National Commission, the petitioner has approached this Court. Therefore, we dismiss this writ petition as not maintainable, in view of efficacious statutory remedy available to the petitioner under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. 4. Interim order granted on 11.07.2024 shall remain in operation for a period of six (6) weeks. 5. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, pending I.As., if any, are disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9