Pulavarti Tejo v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary
WP/7969/2015 · 2026-01-29
Battu Devanand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19432 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19432 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010147252015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7969/2015 Between: 1.PULAVARTI TEJO, UDAYABHASKAR, S/O.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O.13-69, AKIVIDU VILLAGE & MANDAL ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE WEST GODAVARI DIST ELURU, -
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER AKIVIDU POLICE STATION, AKIVIDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, O/O. THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, AKIVIDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. PONNAMANDA VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARIU, AGED 63 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-4/1, JAMMUVARI STREET, AKIVIDU VILLAGE & MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT. 2 DEV,J W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015
6. PONNAMANDA VENKATA KALYAN, S/O. VENKATA NARAYANA, AGED 30 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-4/1, JAMMUVARI STREET, AKIVIDU VILLAGE & MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT. 7. KATTA GANGA RAJU, S/O. LATE BULLI SWAMY, AGED 63 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-29, MATTAVARI STREET, AKIVUDU VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT. 8. KATTA YESUBABU, S/O. GANGA RAJU, 29 YEARS DOOR NO.16-29, MATTAVARI STREET, AKIVUDU VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT. 9. KATTA BULLI SWAMY, S/O. GANGA RAJU, AGED 37 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-29, MATTAVARI STREET, AKIVUDU VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT. 10.ANKANI DURGA LAKSHMI, W/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED 33 YEARS, DOOR NO.30/767-116, VULLINGIPALEM, MACHALIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 11.KOKKIRAGADDA SATYAVATHI, W/O. NAGARAJU, AGED 29 YEARS, H. NO.30-795-6, VULLINGIPALEM, MACHALIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 12.TAMMU SUNITA, W/O. SURESH, AGED 24 YEARS, H. NO.30-795-6, VULLINGIPALEM, MACHALIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the official respondents is not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner filed on 21-02-2015 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and
3 DEV,J W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015 300 A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct respondents to initiated appropriate (Criminal ) legal action against the res.
No.4 to 12 basing on the complaint of the petitioner dtd.21-02-2015 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 10520 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR against 4th to 12 respondents and investigate in to the matter pending disposal of the main WP No. of 2015 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
4 DEV,J W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015
ORDER Smt.Indu, learned counsel representing Mr.K.L.N Swamy,
learned counsel for the petitioner on record represents that this matter has become infructuous.
2. In view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND 30.01.2026 LSP
5 DEV,J W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015